Team,I am trying to inlcude the Bill Description as part of the AP641000 check with Remittance in Acumatica, the only way I found to do the relation is to do a APPayment related to APAdjust and the APAdjust to the APInvoice to get the Bill Description. In this report, I used the BillType variable to now host the APInvoice.DocDesc, on a check with 3 bills paid, the remmirance DocDesc is correct for the first two lines, but not the third line. I hope somebody could check the report and let me know if I am missing something. Thank you.
Hi All, We recently upgraded to 2022r1 version. In the incoming email GI CO4090PL, we can see the Owner field being set dynamically to the Owner of the respective Workgroup. Is there any setting that controls this dynamic allocation? We don’t want the dynamic allocation to happen.Regards,Vibin
Hi everyone,I had implemented a web hook in 23R1 using the PX.Data.Webhooks.IWebhookHandler and I now attempt to upgrade my code to 23R2. In this version, the PX.Data.Webhooks.IWebhookHandler interface has been deprecated and I have to change my code so as to implement the interface PX.Api.Webhooks.IWebhookHandle instead. Does anyone has an exemple of webhook with this new interface ?Thank you
Hi Everyone, I'm having issues writing tests for code that use SelectFrom.I’m trying to set up a Unit test for the below method. public static List<KitSpec> GetKitSpecs(PXGraph graph, int? InventoryID) { var ksl = new List<KitSpec>(); var result = SelectFrom<INKitSpecStkDet>. InnerJoin<INKitSpecHdr>.On<INKitSpecHdr.revisionID.IsEqual<INKitSpecStkDet.revisionID> .And<INKitSpecHdr.kitInventoryID.IsEqual<INKitSpecStkDet.kitInventoryID>>>. InnerJoin<InventoryItem>.On<InventoryItem.inventoryID.IsEqual<INKitSpecStkDet.compInventoryID>>. Where<INKitSpecStkDet.kitInventoryID.IsEqual<@P.AsInt>. And<INKitSpecHdr.isActive.IsEqual<@P.AsBool>>. And<INKitSpecHdrExt.usrMAXXINDefault.IsEqual<@P.AsBool>>>. AggregateTo<GroupBy<INKitSpecStkDet.
Hi, I have been facing issues where employee working time against project is not updating correctly under Cost Budget tab. Few checks done -GL Accural Account under Project and Expense Accural Account for Non Stock Item are same. It belongs to Labour Account groupUOM is displayed same for Project transactions and on Cost Budget line.When employee enters hours for project, Actual qty is not updated. It still displays 0Recalculate Project balances does not affect. Please help.
Hi Acumatica community! Is it possible to do cycle counting and not freeze inventory? My client wants to continue their operations while some staff cycle count.
We’d like to “Update Matrix Items” with the attribute values that we’ve added to our Template Items. We learned, after selling some items for free, that it also over-writes the default price with the 0.00 from the Template. Our Matrix Items represent sizes and are each their own price, so we’d like to NOT update the price when we use the “Update Matrix Items” function. Is this possible?
I have a GI that refuses to output a Pivot Table. What types of things mght block pivot tables? I have full admin rights in this system. I can MAKE the pivot, but the display is empty. Here is an example: Without any parameters etc, I have data and I know that every record has a BRANCH associated with it, so at the very least, I should get a list of branches here. I have the dates rounding to YEAR, so I should see something like 2019 <> 2020 <> 2021 <> 2022 <> 2023 across the columns too. But no matter what fields I use to make the pivot, I get this empty pivot table. Anyone know what types of things inside a GI might create a block on pivots like this? Side Panels? Groupings? Mixed Aggregates? Thanks,
The Variable Labor OH by Qty / Cost is calculated when an operation moves. The prerequisite is that the actual labor cost must be posted against the operation prior to the operation being moved. This makes sense conceptually. However, for clients that use clock entry and approve clock entry process, the actual labor does not get posted until the next day (or later). The move happens in real time as an operation is completed. The issue is that since the operation is already moved / completed, the variable labor overhead does not get calculated when the labor is posted. This is a timing issue, and causes the production order to not incorporate the variable labor overheads. I am curious how other members of the community may have solved for this? Thanks!
We have a customer who would like the ability to enter Sales Tax information for Customers and Locations in Acumatica, including an uploaded certificate image, and have that same information populated in AvaTax’s Certificate Management database without having to manually enter it. We’re aware of a library of APIs Avalara provides, and we’re wondering if anyone has developed scripts to accomplish this? The overarching goal is to enter the data once rather than having to add the info in both Avalara and Acumatica. The other driving factor is that customer exemption information entered in Avalara is not visible in Acumatica and requires users to log in to Avalara to determine if a customer already has an exemption certificate on file.
We’ve had a push notification which has been working for quite some time, and then a couple of months ago, it simply stopped firing/triggering push notifications.After some investigation, it appears that when you make use of a custom field in the conditions tab of the GI that’s being monitored, it simply doesn’t trigger. To test my theory, I set up a super basic GI and managed to get push notifications to go through to https://webhook.site/. However, as soon as I add a custom field into the condition tab of the same GI, the push notifications no longer trigger. Based on this test, it looks like custom fields are no longer supported. We recently upgraded to the version 23.112.0032. Is anyone else aware of this change, and what options do I have to trigger push notifications based on a custom field on the SOOrder changing?
Hello. I am looking for an idea or a solution to a problem. We have noticed a bug that is triggered when there are too many panels in the detail section, or when there is a section with "PrintOnEveryPage" in the middle of the report without the "PrintAtBottom" attribute. Under these circumstances, the actual footer moves up and down instead of staying where it should be. Is there another way to circumvent this problem other than not using panels in detail sections or working without "PrintOnEveryPage"?
Good afternoon. Not sure why the “prepare tax report” is not working for Quebec, Sask, Manitoba. Pls. let me know what are the steps we need to do. thank you
Get Started HERE and be sure toIntroduce Yourself
Already have an account? Login
Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.