Ideas for Acumatica

Important! Please note that we do not reply to all messages, but we do read them, analyze them, and work to improve Acumatica based on the feedback we receive.
This portal is for product ideas and feedback only. If you need customer service assistance, please contact your Acumatica Support Partner or submit a support case.  You can also get assistance from community resources:  LinkedIn Group or StackOverflow
No Reliance: Information is maintained on a best-efforts basis and may be changed without notice. Acumatica cannot guarantee the accuracy of the information provided or guarantee completion of features/ideas described on this portal. 

Automatically Populate Warehouse On Shop For Rates Screen

When you "Shop For Rates" on a sales order, the warehouse field is not automatically populated.

  • Lance Caswell
  • Mar 16 2015
  • Attach files
  • Gabriel Michaud commented
    March 16, 2015 20:37

    Hi Lance,

    The warehouse field on the sales order should have no relationship to the shop for rates; it is actually populated from the customer location and serves as the default warehouse for lines that you add. The actual calculation of rates should look at the content of the order, not the lines. Can you please clarify your requirement, what extra steps it is adding and how you would like system to behave?

  • Lance Caswell commented
    March 16, 2015 21:43

    Thanks for your reply. If what you're saying is true, then I either have something misconfigured, or there's a bug. The warehouse is filled in on the customer location profile, but when I click shop for rates, it's not populated. Two screenshots linked here:

    Customer Screen

    Shop For Rates Screen

  • Gabriel Michaud commented
    March 16, 2015 21:50

    OK, I see what you mean. You are adding the packages manually to your order, and that the packages were not calculated automatically. It should definitely default it from the "Preferred Warehouse ID" field on the Sales Order itself (which is defaulted from the Customer), I will categorize it as a bug on our end. Internal reference is AC-52098.

  • Lance Caswell commented
    March 16, 2015 21:59

    Thank you.